Sunday, February 24, 2013

"Six Strikes" Anti-Piracy Scheme Starts Monday

The much-discussed U.S. six strikes anti-piracy scheme is expected to go live on Monday. The start date hasn’t been announced officially by the CCI but a source close to the scheme confirmed the plans. During the coming months millions of BitTorrent users will be actively monitored by copyright holders. After repeated warnings, Internet subscribers risk a heavy reduction in download speeds and temporary browsing restrictions.

During the summer of 2011 the MPAA and RIAA teamed up with five major Internet providers in the United States, announcing their a plan to warn and “punish” BitTorrent pirates.

The parties launched the Center for Copyright Information (CCI) and agreed on a system through which Internet account holders will be warned if their connections are used to commit copyright infringement. After five or six warnings ISPs may then take a variety of repressive measures.

Initially the first ISPs were expected to send out the first “copyright alerts” by the end of 2011, but for reasons unknown this deadline silently passed, as did the revised July 2012 and the December 2012 start dates.

But it appears that the wait is over now.

TorrentFreak learned from a source close to CCI that the system is currently scheduled to launch early next week, and we’re not the only ones. Another sign of the start of the program is that a few days ago the CCI launched their new website. This is where recipients of the copyright alerts will be directed to.

The website explains how the copyright alert system works and lists places where people can download and stream music and movies legally. It also lists details about the appeals process for people who want to dispute one of the warnings.

Copyright Alert promo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQTONXs_N-A&feature=player_embedded#t=0s


Unfortunately the new website does not give an overview of the punishments or mitigation measures that Internet subscribers will be subjected to.

We previously learned that AT&T will block users’ access to some of the most frequently visited websites on the Internet, until they complete a copyright course. Verizon will slow down the connection speeds of repeated pirates, and Time Warner Cable will temporarily interrupt people’s ability to browse the Internet.

It’s expected that the two remaining providers, Cablevison and Comcast, will take similar measures. None of the ISPs will permanently disconnect repeat infringers as part of the plan.

Of course, there are plenty of ways for people to prevent being monitored by copyright holders. BitTorrent proxies and VPN services are the most likely option here. These services replace a user’s home IP-address with one provided by the proxy service, making it impossible for tracking companies to identify who is doing the file-sharing.

Also, those who download through Usenet, cyberlockers or other non-P2P services can not be monitored by the copyright alert system at all.

These circumvention options are not news to the copyright holders and the ISPs. CCI Executive Director Jill Lesser previously said that the main purpose of the alerts is to educate the public, and that hardcore pirates are not the target of the system.

TorrentFreak asked the CCI if it had any idea how many alerts would be sent out in the first few months of the scheme, but the organization didn’t want to make any predictions. We will find out more in the weeks to come. The same is true for the backdoor lawsuit option that was baked into the plan.

view.gifView: Original Article

Thursday, February 21, 2013

HTC announces HTC One

HTC has just unveiled their brand new Android flagship device: the HTC One. The device carriers some impressive specs but most of them have already been previously leaked.

Tnr9gd7.jpg

After a long wait – and many, many leaks – HTC has has officially announced the HTC One, its newest Android flagship device. The announcement confirms what all the previous leaks hinted at, as the brand new device has some very impressive specs.

The HTC One has a massive 4.7-inch LCD 3 1080p display amounting to an astounding 468 pixels per inch, very similar to the display from an earlier release from HTC, the J Butterfly. The phone is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 quad-core CPU with clock speeds of 1.7GHz. Additionally, the phone features 2 GB of RAM as well as either 32 or 64 GB of internal storage depending on the model. Along with the typical LTE and Bluetooth 4.0 support, the phone has an IR blaster embedded in its power button at the top of the phone to let users control TVs and other devices. To keep everything running the phone has a 2,300 mAh battery.

T3NBKQB.jpg

The spectacular display on the new phone is not its only "killer feature," as the new device comes with a unique camera on the back, something HTC has hinted at for weeks. The phone uses new technology, which HTC has dubbed "ultra pixels," to have larger pixels to absorb more light, leading to some very impressive photography, although HTC limits the output resolution of the photos to 4MP. The camera also feature optical image stabilization, similar to Nokia's 920, to reduce blur in low-light pictures and improve video capture. This technology is aimed at competing with Nokia's Pureview brand that uses oversampling to achieve the same effect.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N9A8NnBbW_A









The HTC One also comes with Beats audio technology and runs Android 4.1.2. On top of that HTC have thrown their new, lighter and redesigned Sense 5.0 software which focuses on a tiled interface. The new Sense also brings many of HTC's customization features on top of Android.

HTC is aiming at an international launch for this device with over 185 carriers world wide. As earlier rumors predicted, the phone will be available in the U.S. starting in late March on AT&T, T-Mobile and Sprint with pricing possibly starting at $199 for the 32GB model. In the UK O2, Vodafone, Three and EE are all signed up to carry this device. It will come in black and silver. For those who want to find out a bit more and to register for a $100 discount offer visit the product page on HTC's site.

view.gifView: Original Article

Scans reveal intricate brain wiring

_65927421_axial41top.jpg

Scientists are set to release the first batch of data from a project designed to create the first map of the human brain.

The project could help shed light on why some people are naturally scientific, musical or artistic.

Some of the first images were shown at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Boston.

I found out how researchers are developing new brain imaging techniques for the project by having my own brain scanned.

Scientists at Massachusetts General Hospital are pushing brain imaging to its limit using a purpose built scanner. It is one of the most powerful scanners in the world.
The scanner's magnets need 22MW of electricity - enough to power a nuclear submarine.

The researchers invited me to have my brain scanned. I was asked if I wanted "the 10-minute job or the 45-minute 'full monty'" which would give one of the most detailed scans of the brain ever carried out.
Only 50 such scans have ever been done.

I went for the full monty.

It was a pleasant experience enclosed in the scanner's vast twin magnets. Powerful and rapidly changing magnetic fields were looking to see tiny particles of water travelling along the larger nerve fibres.
By following the droplets, the scientists in the adjoining cubicle are able to trace the major connections within my brain.

Continue article

Ubuntu OS for tablets annnounced

As predicted, Canonical has officially announced plans to launch a tablet version of its Linux-based Ubuntu operating system, with a number of features made especially for the larger touchscreen.

AtPY9df.jpg

A few weeks ago, Canonical announced plans to enter the smartphone market with a new user interface for its Linux-based Ubuntu operating system. Today, the company announced a plan to bring that UI to the larger touchscreens found on tablets.

Canonical posted up a video on YouTube which showed off the various features of the tablet themed Ubuntu interface. One of them allows for multiple secure accounts to be used on just one tablet. Another feature is called "side stage" which allows phone apps to run on the tablet at the same time as a tablet-based app as an example of multitasking.

Canonical claims that future versions of Ubuntu will be able to run an Ubuntu app across four different user interfaces (desktop, TV, smartphone and tablet) with no need for special programming for each version. Engadget chatted with Canonical's Mark Shuttleworth which claims Ubuntu has "cracked this one in a way that has eluded Microsoft".

Shuttleworth is referring to the fact that, at the moment, apps made for Windows 8 (x86 programs) cannot run on Windows RT or Windows Phone without a special effort to port those apps. However, we have reported that Microsoft appears to be making plans to solve that problem in future versions of Windows.

Canonical has plans to release the early developer source code for both the Ubuntu smartphone and tablet UI on Thursday, February 21st. The code can be used by the Galaxy Nexus and Nexus 4 smartphones as well as the Nexus 7 and Nexus 10 tablets from Google. A commercial tablet that will run on the OS won't likely be released until sometime in 2014.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=h384z7Ph0gU










view.gifView: Original Article

White House must answer for ban on unlocking cell phones

Petition demanding reversal of phone unlock ban hits 100,000 signatures.

The White House is going to have to provide answers on whether it thinks cell phone unlocking should be illegal. Unlocking cell phones unties them from specific carriers, allowing users to switch to a different cellular provider. This was legal until recently, when the Library of Congress decided not to renew the Digital Millennium Copyright Act exemption for unlocking.

Outraged cell phone users filed a White House Petition demanding the reversal of this policy. The petition was filed just days after the White House said petitions would only get an answer if they received 100,000 signatures within a month, rather than the previous threshold of 25,000.

The cell phone unlock petition passed 100,000 today, two days before the deadline. You can still sign it if you wish. The text reads:

WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:

Make Unlocking Cell Phones Legal.

The Librarian of Congress decided in October 2012 that unlocking of cell phones would be removed from the exceptions to the DMCA.

As of January 26, consumers will no longer be able unlock their phones for use on a different network without carrier permission, even after their contract has expired.

Consumers will be forced to pay exorbitant roaming fees to make calls while traveling abroad. It reduces consumer choice, and decreases the resale value of devices that consumers have paid for in full.

The Librarian noted that carriers are offering more unlocked phones at present, but the great majority of phones sold are still locked.

We ask that the White House ask the Librarian of Congress to rescind this decision, and failing that, champion a bill that makes unlocking permanently legal.


While the White House typically provides a response to petitions, there doesn't seem to be any deadline for it to do so. For example, one successful petition from May 2012 asking the government to "require free access over the Internet to scientific journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research" has gone unanswered.

view.gifView: Original Article

Pirate Bay Bandwidth Supplier Disconnected, But The Ship Sails On

This week the Swedish Pirate Party and one of its bandwidth suppliers were told that they must stop servicing The Pirate Bay or face legal action. It now appears similar threats were extended to Portlane, another Internet provider even further up the connectivity supply chain. TorrentFreak has learned that in a move designed to protect Portlane, The Pirate Bay is no longer utilizing bandwidth from this provider. This shows that even if Portlane had complied, the site would have remained online.

In 2010 after Hollywood studios obtained injunctions against the site’s former hosting providers, The Pirate Bay turned to the Swedish Pirate Party for support.

The party, which has long stood for the same free sharing of information ideals as The Pirate Bay, agreed to begin supplying bandwidth to the site. For three years the arrangement went along just fine, but now there is a serious challenge to the status quo.

This Tuesday the Pirate Party announced that they had received legal threats from the Swedish Rights Alliance. Stop serving TPB with Internet connectivity, they ordered, or face legal action in a week. But can the party be held liable as a traditional host might?

Yesterday, in an attempt to illustrate the relationship the party has with the site, former Pirate Bay spokesman Peter Sunde described the technical setup and how it differs from a regular hosting arrangement.

“There is no question of the Pirate Party being a final destination for The Pirate Bay, but rather a stretch of road. [The party's systems] store no data, there is no data in them. Everything is in cables only temporarily,” he wrote.

But despite the technical differences between hosting and simply pushing data around, the threats from Rights Alliance persist.

Serious Tubes, the company that sells bandwidth to the Pirate Party, also received similar threats from Rights Alliance. They were ordered to stop providing bandwidth to the Pirate Party and must now consider their position and reveal their intentions by next Tuesday, February 26.

But not content with moving at least two steps up the bandwidth chain with legal threats, new information has revealed that Rights Alliance have taken things even further by threatening to sue Portlane, the Swedish Internet provider that supplies Serious Tubes with bandwidth.

To underline just how detached this situation has become, picture this. The Pirate Bay (hosted who-knows-where) is connected directly (or maybe indirectly) to the Pirate Party. In turn the party are connected to Serious Tubes, who in turn are connected to Portlane. So what we have here is the supplier of the supplier of the supplier of bandwidth to The Pirate Bay coming under legal threat. That’s quite a chain.

Nevertheless, indications are that the long chain of intermediaries, all of which act as “mere conduits” as far as Internet connectivity is concerned, are taking the threats fairly seriously.

A little while ago Cluez, a member of the Pirate Party’s admin group, told TorrentFreak via party founder Rick Falkvinge that Portlane are no longer involved in the supply chain to Pirate Bay.

“Serious Tubes routed past Portlane on their own initiative, because of a threat against Portlane, as to not put Portlane in unnecessary trouble,” he confirmed.

But before readers begin frantically opening new tabs to check that The Pirate Bay is still alive, rest assured that panic is not required. Measures are already in place to safeguard the site’s uptime.

“Obviously, Serious Tubes (and Pirate Party) are now getting their bandwidth from elsewhere,” comments Rasmus Fleischer, one of the founders of PiratbyrĂ„n, the group that founded The Pirate Bay.

“No one should think that TPB will stand or fall solely with the Pirate Party supply.”

It’s clear that The Pirate Bay are well prepared for these kinds of attacks on their infrastructure, as the lack of downtime shows. Furthermore, when their entire site can be squeezed onto the smallest of USB sticks, reappearance in new locations is possible in a matter of minutes.

TorrentFreak contacted Portlane for an official comment but we are yet to receive a response.

view.gifView: Original Article

Google offers $3.14159 million in cash rewards to any hacker who can crack its Chrome operating system

A piece of the pi: Google offers $3.14159 million in cash rewards to any hacker who can crack its Chrome operating system



Google is so confident in security on the
company's Chrome operating system its offering $3.14159 in cash rewards
for successful hacks of the system at this year's Pwnium hacking
contest.



The figure is a nod to pi, an irrational number that has intrigued mathematicians for thousands of years.



Previously the tech giant has offered reward of $1 million and $2 million to crack its systems.




article-0-174BD1C0000005DC-351_634x632.j

Hack: Crack the Chrome OS and you could win millions



The most likely outcome is that multiple
hacks momentarily compromise the system with several contestants earning
up to $100,000 each, or $150,000 should their hack survive a system
reboot.



For a hack to count, it must be delivered via webpages on a basic-model Samsung 550 Chromebook over a Wi-Fi connection.



'We believe these larger rewards reflect the additional challenge
involved with tackling the security defenses of Chrome OS, compared to
traditional operating systems,' Google Chrome developer Chris Evans
wrote.



Google's previous contestes - CanSecWest 2012 and Hack in the Box -
focused on compromising the Chrome browser but not the same-named OS.




article-0-174BD13C000005DC-39_634x368.jp

Online: Hacks will only count on a Samsung laptop and done via Wi-Fi



Pwnium was started last year as an
alternative to the Pwn2Own contest after the latter temporarily changed
its rules so that successful hackers didn't have to show their methods.



For some commercial hackers who only sell their secrets to the highest bidder the change was welcome.



For Pwnium, contests can keep their true identities a secret. A teenager
only identified as Pinkie Pie - a name shared by a My Little Pony
character - has won $60,000 at each Pwnium.



While Google calls Chrome OS its most secure operating system its market
share is so small it hasn't yet faced a real world field-test.




article-0-174BD130000005DC-877_634x411.j

Niche: Though Google believes its operating system is solid, its market share is so small it hasn't had a real world field test



However the Pwn2Own prize for cracking
the Chrome browser is $100,000 but only $60,000 for Firefox and $65,000
for Safari. Internet Explorer running on Windows 8 wins $100,000 and IE 9
on Windows 7 nets $75,000.



Pwn2Own winners also get to keep the contest provided laptops.



Pwnium hasn't said whether winners will be able to leave with their
Chromebooks but as they only run $450 its likely the company won't lose
sleep over the losses.



Google has never once paid out the full amount offered for a Chrome browser crack.

 
http://www.dailymail...ing-system.html

Google Fails to Punish "Pirate" Sites in Search Results, RIAA Says

Following mounting pressure from international rightsholders, last year Google finally caved in and said it would start making pirate sites more difficult for its users to find. But, according to the RIAA, this was a false promise. The music group says that sites for which Google receives thousands of DMCA notices still outrank legitimate services. To correct this problem the RIAA is now urging the search engine to immediately make the necessary changes so its pledge becomes a reality.

For years entertainment industry groups have lobbied search engines to penalize sites that link to a high number of copyrighted files, and last summer Google appeared to succumb to these demands.

The search engine announced that it would take into consideration the number of DMCA takedown notices it receives against sites to determine the ranking of those websites in its search results.

Sites with high numbers of removal notices may appear lower in our results, Googles Amit Singhal explained.

However, half a year has passed and according to the RIAA things havent changed for the better. The music group published a report card today, showing that unauthorized downloads still outrank legitimate music stores in many cases.

Six months later, we have found no evidence that Googles policy has had a demonstrable impact on demoting sites with large amounts of piracy. These sites consistently appear at the top of Googles search results for popular songs or artists.

The RIAA monitored the search results for the names of popular artists and tracks, combined with the word MP3 or download, and found that in 98% of instances infringing content was linked in the top 10 results. This was the case despite the fact that Google received thousands of DMCA takedown requests for the sites listed in the initial results.

The search rankings for sites for which Google has received large numbers of instances of infringement do not appear to have been demoted by Googles demotion signal in any meaningful way, at least with respect to searches for downloads or mp3s of specific tracks or artists, RIAA concludes.

The chart below shows a breakdown of the search results. According to the RIAA, three to five of the top 10 search results point to sites for which Google received more than 1,000 DMCA takedown requests. On the other hand, only 0.6 out of 10 search results link to legitimate music stores.

Search results for top 50 music tracks

2NYCvYh.png

In addition the report card points out that Googles filtering of piracy-inducing keywords from their Auto-Complete and Instant features could be better.

Using a similar methodology applied to the search results, the RIAA found that Google suggests names of pirate sites when users type the names of popular artists and tracks, combined with the word MP3 or download.

This problem may be exacerbated by Googles auto-complete function, which suggests that users append terms associated with sites for which Google has received notices of multiple instances of infringement, RIAA notes.

Pirate suggestions

HvUR0Kg.png

The RIAA concludes that Google must step up its effort to downrank infringing search results, and says its happy to lend a hand.

Research shows that users trust search engines like Google to lead them to legitimate sites when searching for music, yet Googles demotion program is not working. We encourage Google to immediately make the necessary changes so its pledge becomes a reality, and we stand ready to work with Google in that endeavor, they write.

Whether Google intends to take up this suggestion remains to be seen. One things for certain though pressure from the RIAA and other anti-piracy groups will only increase during the coming years.

view.gifView: Original Article

Sunday, February 10, 2013

FBI Employees Download Pirated Movies and TV-Shows

anti-piracyOnline piracy is a serious crime according to the FBI.
“ItĂą€™s a growing threatĂą€”especially with the rise of digital technologies and Internet file sharing networks,” they write on their website.
Over the past years the FBI has been involved in many piracy related cases. The high-profile Megaupload investigation for example, where a federal agent used an “undercover computer” to browse the file-hosting site.
In this light it is quite a surprise that some employees at the FBI appear to be sharing copyrighted material out in the open, through BitTorrent.
With help from BitTorrent monitoring company ScanEye we found several BitTorrent “pirates” linked to IP-addresses that are registered to FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division.
Below is a snapshot of some of the “hits” we found.
fbi-pirates
As can be seen above there is a particular interest in movies and TV-show downloads at the FBI’s largest division.
Some of the titles are relevant to the intelligence community such as “Homeland”, “The Girl Who played With Fire”, “The Good Wife” and “Dexter”. Other titles, including the Aussie soap opera Home and Away, are more general entertainment.
The big question is of course why these FBI IP-addresses are showing up in BitTorrent swarms.
The most likely explanation is that employees were downloading these videos for personal entertainment. This wouldn’t be much of a surprise really, as we’ve seen this before at congressional offices the Department of Justice, national parliaments, record labels and movie studios.
Another option is that the FBI is downloading the torrents as part of an ongoing investigation. However, this is less likely as ScanEye shows that the downloads are spread out over several months.
Or perhaps the IP-addresses were spoofed by Kim Dotcom to get back at the feds?
Source: FBI Employees Download Pirated Movies and TV-Shows


Posted Image View: Original Article

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Warner Bros. Targets Kim Dotcom's Mega With Bogus DMCA Requests

In a bogus DMCA request Warner Bros. has asked Google to remove several links to Kim Dotcom’s cloud hosting service Mega. Not only did the movie studio send in the wrong URLs, they also failed to note that Mega download links aren’t indexed by Google to begin with. Adding to the controversy, Warner Bros does not appear to have sent Mega a direct takedown request for the infringing content in question.
Copyright holders are increasingly trying to take down allegedly infringing links by sending millions of DMCA takedown notices to Google and elsewhere each month.

Unfortunately, not all of their requests are accurate.

Sometimes these mishaps are amusing, such as when copyright holders try to take down their own legitimate content. In other cases errors can lead to thousands of websites being censored by mistake.

Today we discovered another bogus takedown request, one that may bring a smile to Kim Dotcom’s face.

Last week Warner Bros. sent a DMCA notice to Google asking the search engine to remove 964 URLs that allegedly link to infringing copies of the movie “Gangster Squad.” The notice in question also lists 16 links to Mega.co.nz, Dotcom’s new cloud hosting service.

Nothing out of the ordinary, as all file-hosting services store some copyrighted content on their servers. However, Warner Bros’ request is inaccurate on several fronts.

First and foremost, Mega has decided that Google can’t index their site. This means that even if links to pirated content are posted publicly elsewhere on the Internet, Google will not add these URLs to their search engine.

In other words, the URLs that Warner Bros. asked Google to remove were never indexed to begin with.

The second problem with the takedown requests is that the URLs are inaccurate, and don’t point to any copyrighted material. Apparently the automated web scraper used by Warner Bros. can’t handle the format of Mega links, replacing “#!” with “?escaped_fragment=”.

The same errors were later repeated in DMCA notices Warner Bros. sent for other movies, including Argo.

Mega fail

0DW8AJ7.jpg

The files that Warner Bros. meant to take down are currently still available on Mega, suggesting that the movie studio didn’t issue a separate DMCA notice to the file-hosting service itself.

Interestingly, Warner Bros. is not the only rightsholder to make the same mistake. Several others have also sent takedown notices to Google for allegedly infringing content on Mega that was never indexed.

The above once again shows the dangers of automated DMCA notices that are sent without any type of verification. Right now rightsholders and the anti-piracy outfits they employ have absolutely no incentive to improve the accuracy of their takedown systems.

Even the most fundamental checks, such as whether Google actually indexes the links, are ignored. Perhaps it’s time for these continual erros to have some kind of penalty attached?

view.gifView: Original Article

Windows Blue may reach beyond Windows

We have been hearing about Windows Blue for the past few months and what we initially thought would be an update to Windows 8 and possibly landing this summer but it may be much more than that.

We have been hearing about Windows Blue off and on for the past few months and what we initially thought would be an update to Windows 8 and possibly landing this summer, Mary Jo Foley has some dug up some new information about the update and it looks like it Windows Blue may extend beyond the Windows platform.

MJF, citing a well trusted source, says Blue is not only an update to Windows, but a wide swath of updates that will come across many platforms including Windows Phone, SkyDrive, Hotmail, and Windows Server.

In addition to the update to the major platforms, Windows Blue might be arriving via the Windows Store as opposed to a more traditional download and install based package. This makes sense as Microsoft would have more control over the distribution of the service through one integrated platform.



So what about Windows 9? It is apparently still on the roadmap but no timeline has been set. Many had thought that Microsoft would possibly kill the major branding updates in favor of waves (like Blue) to shorten release time between major updates.

With an updated release timeline such as Windows Blue, it would seem that Blue will be a package of small improvement to the platform as opposed to a major update and rebranding to Windows 9.

While we wait for Microsoft to come clean about its plans and the future of Windows 8, you can talk about Windows 8 developments in our Microsoft forum.

View: Original Article

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Microsoft: 'We're the underdogs now' [Admits Users Are Disappointed with Windows 8]

Exclusive: Frank Shaw tells us how Microsoft plans to claw back the market in 2013
Frank%20X.%20Shaw_2009-580-75.jpg

Talking to Frank Shaw, it seems that Microsoft is starting 2013 in combative mode. "If I'm going to have a party with my Facebook friends, it looks like a lot of fun. I have a lot of Facebook friends. And then a
party with my Google+ friends, I could probably have in a rowboat…" says Microsoft's comms chief (full job title: corporate vice president, corporate communications).

Microsoft could reasonably take a breather this year after the effort of shipping Windows 8 and Windows Phone and refreshing almost its entire product line in 2012. That, however, is not the plan. Shaw gives us a few hints about the coming year – and some clues to understanding Microsoft's wider strategy. "2013 is going to be a big year," he promises. "Yes, we shipped a bunch of stuff in 2012 but there's more coming."

"We've got some new stuff coming from Bing that is interesting and provocative and continues to move the needle in terms of how people think about search. And you have the work that we are doing with Skype. The move of Office to the cloud, Office as a subscription service for consumers and all the  things that come with that; it's a big deal. And with Xbox we have more we're going to do. We're certainly not done with thinking about the living room and we'll have more to say about that as the year goes through."
Into the Blue? One criticism of Microsoft is that it's failed to produce an integrated product line like Google's, and has consequently fallen behind. That is an issue that 2013 will address, says Shaw. "Across Windows and Windows Phone there is this entire ecosystem that really has received a jolt of adrenaline. We always think about the launch of Windows as the starting line.

001-1-580-90.jpg
 
"There's more new hardware, there's more new applications, you see momentum in the app store, people are starting to look at it and say, 'Wow, that's pretty cool. I can do things with it I couldn't do before and now I'm going to experiment and bring new things in.' I think you'll see a ton of that over the next year."

Unsurprisingly, he wouldn't give us any specifics about Windows Blue (the possible codename for Windows 9) or even if we'll see new versions of Windows more frequently. "I don't know that I have anything new to say there. You have certainly seen across a variety of our products a cadence that
looks like that; Windows Phone is a good for example of that. When we're ready to talk about how that looks more broadly we will, but right now you just have to look at what we've done in those areas."
Improving by jumps But more frequent updates (something Microsoft is also doing with services like Bing and SkyDrive) wouldn't mean only getting incremental improvements and sacrificing big innovations, he maintains. "It's like this concept of punctuated equilibrium. You get a series of improvements and then you have to find a way of punctuating them and having a jump, and then you start that improvement cycle again. You have to plan for both.

"Sometimes those jumps are enabled by new hardware capability or by new demand that we see in the marketplace or something that we want to create. You have to think really carefully about how you
consistently improve the product that you have, and how do you make that big jump forward and when you make that big jump forward, how do you do it in a way that is not discontinuous with your users."
In those terms, Windows 8 is one of the big jumps forward (and opinion is obviously divided on the discontinuity part). "It is a significant shift. Windows over time has improved in really significant ways;
Windows 8 is a jump in terms of the touch-first focus and some of the new platform elements. So you make that jump and you start that drive again to make it better, make it better, make it better… More apps, more hardware, more functionality built in.

"But there's always this moment when you make the jump and everybody looks at that and says 'that
makes me nervous' or 'that change is hard'. We certainly see some of that as well. But we're committed to building not just for the next month but for the next 18 months, 36 months - whatever the time is on
this new platform."

With the Windows interface still highly disputed, we wondered whether a future version of Windows might change the controversial elements. "I think when you are asking people to learn new things, whether it's Start or the ribbon in Office, you have to be committed to your course. But being committed to your course also means you continue to take input and feedback and react to it the appropriate ways.

windows8rtm-580-90.jpg

"When you have as many users as we do, you get phenomenal feedback. [Sometimes] they say how much they love you! And then some of it is feedback like, 'Jeez, have you thought about this?'  Sometimes we have thought about it and sometimes we should take a look at what we can do in that specific case. We don't ever want to say we're not taking feedback any more."

The amount of feedback Microsoft has been getting about Windows 8 is a question of scale, he points out. "The thing that people miss sometimes: we sold 60 million licenses to Windows users and if 1 per cent of those users are disgruntled in some way, that's a big overall number. The beauty of the world today is that everybody has a voice. In the past some of those conversations took place for any product but they weren't visible. And now we live in this transparent world where everything is visible and people with a concern can express it very loudly. And that's good! It's good to have input - but you always have to calibrate. Is this universal input, is this an edge case? How do we think about this? All our products have many, many users and so we get lots and lots of feedback that we have to judge."
Taking on Google One thing we'll definitely see more of this year is Microsoft giving Google a hard time. It's no accident that Shaw calls new developments in Bing "provocative". Remember the Gmail Man video? "There are places where we are underdogs," he says. "And we're either real underdogs, as we are in Bing, or we're perceptual underdogs. There are people out there who think we are not doing as well as we
are."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eFCSp23xl40



Being the underdog forces Microsoft to innovate: "If you have an entrenched market leader like Google is in search and you have a different point of view, you have to break through on that.

"And you can't just break through against people who already use you; you have to break through against people who use the other guy. And to do that have to say why you are different and why you are better. And that also means that you have to be willing to be more comparative in how you do that. You've seen that with the Bing it on Google challenge. We know that when people do this in a blind test that they like what we've done and we have to break the habit that people have built up and show them
there is a different way."


And that's where the Google+ rowboat comes in: "There's the work we've done with Facebook and real social search." Facebook chose Bing over Google when choosing a search partner for its new Graph Search, and Facebook is where you probably have your real friends, Shaw suggests - and rather more of them than on Google+. (Although he notes, "Google is working very hard to pull people into that Google+ ecosystem. They are committed to getting people to sign up to that thing…")

Will we get more of the self-deprecating Internet Explorer ads? "The best thing about the Internet Explorer ads is reading the comments and the stories. It was like, 'Are we paying these people to make these comments? Because they are making our point way better than we did.' We were not. People liked it and they responded to it."
A refreshed MS It's not just that the ads are funny. It's that they show how Microsoft has changed. "The thing is - we have learned some lessons. Every company makes mistakes, every single company in the world. We aspire to be a learning company. We look at decisions we made and they might have been good decisions at the time but they weren't over time the right decisions and we say we're going to do it differently. IE is a great example of that."

Not everyone takes those changes at face value, leading to some interesting gymnastics as supporters of the open web find themselves on the same side as Microsoft. "I think it's interesting that we are advocates of the open web and people are like 'huh?' People are having some trouble with that but it's true. People should be willing to accept we're doing this because we've learned and we've grown and it's good for everybody."

Is it frustrating for Microsoft to do the right thing and still have people be suspicious? "It's understandable. Perceptions change over time. We've been pretty consistent and hopefully people will look at us in what we're doing and not necessarily why they think we might doing that."

Source: TechRadar

Japanese Government Plants Anti-Piracy Warnings Inside Fake Downloads

Last year saw a major upgrade in Japan’s anti-piracy legislation in an attempt to shift Internet users away from file-sharing sites and networks and towards the country’s legitimate outlets. But while the change in the law was significant, getting the legal-downloading message to users proved problematic. In response the government and rightsholders are now seeding fake files with anti-piracy messages hidden inside.

Ever since the dawn of online file-sharing fake files have proven some of the most annoying pieces of digital data ever to disgrace the Internet.

These miserable specimens of unwanted code nearly always find their way onto users’ machines through deception, masquerading as something desirable but turning out to be something utterly unwanted. Only last week TorrentFreak was exposed to blatant spam disguised as documentary subtitles.

Malware and virus creators rely on similar techniques in order to deliver their payloads but fortunately we have software for dealing with these kinds of attacker. The same cannot be said about those who pollute file-sharing networks with fakes.

In addition to the straight idiots who think that renaming porn videos as kids’ cartoons is still somehow amusing, for years anti-piracy companies have dabbled with the concept of fake files. Nearly all were deliberately marked up as something they’re not in order lure people in one end with excitement and spit them out the other with disappointment.

However, the Japanese government thinks it can do better with a similar scheme, but with one that replaces the end result with enlightenment, the rage with a sense of fear, and those file-sharing urges with those that involve spending money.

Hot on the heels of the 2012 introduction of new tough legislation aimed at reducing unauthorized online file-sharing, local authorities have launched a campaign to draw attention to the perils faced by online pirates. But instead of targeting TV, radio or even social media, the government has gone straight to the source by advertising directly on P2P networks.

At the end of last month, Japan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications in conjunction with movie and music studios announced “Operation Decoy File”, a copyright awareness campaign stuffed inside – you guessed it – fake files.

“To deter illegal distribution of content using P2P file sharing software the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications [and various rightsholder companies and organizations] will until mid-February 2013 conduct experiments to contribute to the enlightenment of users who attempt to download illegal content using the same software,” the Ministry announced.

A translation of the notice (original here, Japanese pdf) is shown below:

A Warning from the Organization to Raise Awareness of Copyright

Files with the same name as this contain content which is in violation of copyright when distributed over P2P networks such as Winny or Share.

Knowingly downloading and of course uploading files over the Internet that are protected by copyright law without the consent of the owner is illegal copyright infringement. Please stop immediately.

Also, from 1 October 2012, downloading content which is known to be available for sale is punishable by a maximum 2-year prison sentence and/or 2,000,000 yen [US$21,000] fine.

Our copyright organization is working to eliminate copyright infringement by file sharing software. In addition to consulting with the police to obtain the disclosure of users’ identities, we want to focus on user education.


Although it’s probably going to prove unpopular with most file-sharers, the experiment does raise some interesting points.

While fake files can be an enormous annoyance – including ones containing anti-piracy warnings – this method does reach the target audience directly. Knowing that a just-downloaded file could’ve have come directly from the authorities could serve as a reasonably powerful deterrent, without the need for user privacy to be compromised in any way.

However, it is also likely that such a scheme will only gain traction with the low hanging fruit, such as users who have difficulty telling the difference between a 360KB pdf and a playable MP3, even if they are zipped up or compressed in some way. Perhaps directing users creatively to an official download could’ve yielded even better results, although including a 25% iTunes discount voucher might be going a little far.

view.gifView: Original Article

Pirate Bay Founder Helped Wikileaks On Several Fronts

The upcoming Pirate Bay documentary TPB AFK will highlight some under-reported details about the connection between the BitTorrent site and Wikileaks. Among other things, Pirate Bay founder Gottfrid Svartholm was credited for his involvement in getting the “Collateral Murder” video out to the public. Daniel Domscheit-Berg, the former spokesman of WikiLeaks, further recalls travelling to Sweden with Julian Assange to pay server fees . A meeting he will not forget anytime soon.

This Friday will see the release of TPB AFK, a dark documentary that will follow the three Pirate Bay founder during their trials in Sweden.

TorrentFreak has seen an advance screening of the film and we can say that it’s not a hero story, not at all. It is a unique documentary about three totally different individuals with personalities that often clashed. They had their own motives for becoming involved in The Pirate Bay, and defended them till the bitter end.

Gottfrid Svartholm, the youngest of the three, made the news last year when he was deported from Cambodia to Sweden, where he’s currently serving his prison sentence for his involvement in The Pirate Bay.

In the film Gottfrid comes across as a witty person who likes to challenge the status quo. Known online as Anakata, he can be credited for many of the bold responses to copyright holders that are still published in Pirate Bay’s legal threats section.

TPB AFK tease

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4KKWxq30yb0



Gottfrid also founded Internet company PRQ which provided hosting to many controversial sites including Wikileaks. In TPB AFK this connection is brought up as well, with Daniel Domscheit-Berg saying that Julian Assange has a lot of respect for the Pirate Bay founder.

The former Wikileaks spokesman recalls that he and Julian Assange made a quite an unusual trip to Sweden to hand over the hosting fees in 2008. The Wikileaks duo were surprised by Gottfrid apparent paranoia, and Domscheit-Berg remembers it as one of the weirdest experiences he ever had.

“He came to the hotel. And had someone waiting outside in a car. They had some kind of agreement that Gottfrid would always be near a window. So he stood there in the lobby and behaved really strange. Every half a minute he turned around to see if the guy in the car was still there,” Domscheit-Berg explains.

Gottfrid declined an offer to hang out for a drink, simply accepted the money and which he took off quickly.

However, Gottfrid’s dealings with Wikileaks didn’t stop at providing hosting services. Together with other people connected to The Pirate Bay he helped out the whistle-blower site on several fronts. Most publicly he assisted in the publication of the “Collateral Murder” video, which some regard as Wikileak’s big break.

At the end of the Wikileaks video the Pirate Bay founder is listed as part of the “decryption and transmission team” and credited for “networking.” While the exact nature of his contribution remains unknown, it is no secret that Gottfrid is an encryption specialist and that the leaked footage had to be decrypted before it was of any use.

Collateral Murder Credits

ivjMxQ9.jpg

A Pirate Bay insider informs TorrentFreak that several Pirate Bay “associates” did work for Wikileaks.

“Let’s say we were really good friends once upon a time. The original idea of Wikileaks is really close to that of The Pirate Bay, as you know.”

Our source further confirms that Gottfrid was connected to other Wikileaks endeavors, albeit minimally, and that it is “not improbable” that his contributions were related to crypto activities.

“Anakata has always been involved ‘lightly’ in all projects. Just as with The Pirate Bay, he didn’t really do a lot, because he had so many other things to do. He can’t focus on one thing,” we were told.

Unlike others connected to Wikileaks the Pirate Bay founder appears to get most satisfaction from displaying his skills, rather than displaying himself. With a constant drive to solve new puzzles and break down barriers, the establishment is a natural enemy.

More on Gottfrid Svartholm, the Wikileaks connection and the events surrounding the Pirate Bay trials will be made public on Friday when TPB AFK is released on the Internet.

view.gifView: Original Article

RIAA Set For Historic 10,000,000th Google URL Takedown

From humble beginnings in 2011, last year the RIAA amped up its efforts to have allegedly infringing URLs removed from Google’s public indexes. Fast forward to today and the RIAA is about to hit a historic milestone. During the next few hours the music industry group will issue orders to the world’s largest search engine to take down the 10,000,000th URL on its behalf.

The popularity of Google’s search product, the most prominent tool the company offers, means that Internet users all around the world have a central and free point from where to seek, find and discover information.

Of course, due to the nature of the web that means access to both legitimate and unauthorized content, a situation of which the entertainment companies are well aware.

As a result the music, movie, TV, gaming, software, adult and dozens of other less mainstream industries have been bombarding the search giant with DMCA takedown notices in an attempt to stop Google’s users finding illicit content. Over the past 18 months the scale of the effort has gone from manageable to verging on the unbelievable.

Last month alone 2,362 copyright owners and 1,482 reporting organizations ordered Google to remove 13,665,695 URLs across a total of 43,980 domains. And very soon indeed a group of music rightsholders, who together accounted for 1,721,058 of last month’s takedowns, will reach their own personal milestone.

In the next few hours Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music, Warner Music and EMI – together the four largest member labels of the RIAA – will ask Google to remove the 10,000,000th allegedly infringing URL on their behalf.

NlUZcna.jpg

The first RIAA takedown request listed publicly by Google took place on May 26, 2011 but it took until July 25, 2011 for the takedown numbers to really start adding up. During the week that followed a record 12,447 URLs were filed by the RIAA. By Nov 7 that same year takedowns had reached more than 30,000 URLs per week but it wasn’t until around 10 months ago that the music group really put its foot on the gas.

By the end of April 2012 the RIAA was asking for more than 200,000 URLs to be delisted every week, a level it largely maintained for the following four months. Then in August 2012 the labels opened the floodgates reaching more than 666,000 removal requests in a single week. While requests numbers have been diminishing ever since the numbers are still impressive, amounting to more than 1.7 million last month.

In total the RIAA has targeted 7,041 domains but who exactly are their main enemies? The world’s biggest torrent sites? Or maybe the world’s biggest file hosters? Well, perhaps a little surprisingly it’s none of those. What the labels appear to be doing is ordering Google (a search engine) to remove links that connect to yet more search engines.

With a total of 593,928 takedowns the RIAA’s primary concern seems to be a site called Downloads.nl. The site currently has a worldwide Alexa ranking of 5453 and is particularly popular with Indians. Without wishing to be too insulting it is a graphically bland affair, but type in the name of an artist along with a song title and the content appears – quickly – and can be played or downloaded in an instant. The site also derives at least 30% of its traffic from Google searches.

Second on the list of foes with 403,831 takedowns is MP3s.pl who appear to have the same frugal graphics approach as Downloads.dl. Nevertheless, the site delivers the goods on the MP3 front despite having an Alexa rating of just 44,073. This site also relies heavily on Google for its traffic to the tune of around 32%. Interestingly, through affiliate links MP3s.pl drives around 10% of its traffic to iMesh, an apparently legal P2P network supposedly approved by the RIAA.

In third place is Filestube, a site dedicated to indexing content on file-hosting sites. The search engine, which has a worldwide Alexa ranking of 267, has been reported to Google for a total of 377,236 links, despite not hosting a single file.

The top five takedown targets are completed with MP3Searchy.com (358,334 URLs, Alexa 43,143) and Weblagu.com (347,039 URLs, Alexa 8,699), both of which provide near instant access to music of just about any description.

But the big question remains – does the takedown strategy work?

While it’s obvious that there will be fewer Google links to these sites considering all the takedowns, go over to the sites themselves and search for any popular music and it’s all still there. Even if these top five sites were completely delisted by Google all one needs to do is type in “free mp3 search” into ANY search engine and dozens more MP3 search engines appear.

It is quite possible therefore that another 10,000,000 takedowns still won’t have the desired effect so one has to wonder if there is another strategy at play here. Will there be some kind of attempt to target one of these engines in future based on its “terrible” record of alleged infringements and use the ruling to batter the rest into submission? Time will tell.

view.gifView: Original Article

Monday, February 4, 2013

Mediafire Swaps "Pirate" Links for "Buy Now" Button

The popular tile-hosting service Mediafire is proactively scanning users’ publicly shared files for possible copyright infringements. When the company spots links that shouldn’t be shared in the open, it replaces the download page with a “buy now” link to Amazon where the content can be bought legally. According to Mediafire this policy is meant to protect both users and Mediafire itself.

When Megaupload was shut down last year the actions of competing file-hosting services were watched closely by the press and copyright holders.

Some concluded that other services were guilty by association, and Hollywood went as far as naming several other cyberlockers that should be shutdown next, including Mediafire.

U.S. based Mediafire was shocked by this characterization and emphasized that it has always cooperated with rights holders. On top of that the company has also implemented several measures to ensure that its users play by the rules.

A good example of this policy is Mediafire’s proactive monitoring of unauthorized sharing. With help from Audible Magic‘s digital fingerprinting technology Mediafire checks user’s compliance with the site’s Terms of Service by identifying copyrighted audio and video files.

If Mediafire notices that copyrighted files are being shared in public, the links are disabled.

“In the interest of protecting our users, as well as MediaFire, we use AudibleMagic to prevent the unauthorized sharing of copyrighted audio and video. MediaFire is committed to protecting our users, and this system allows us to do that,” MediaFire co-founder Tom Langridge tells TorrentFreak.

Since users are allowed to backup and store copyrighted material on Mediafire for their own use, the files themselves remain accessible to the user.

“We do not remove any files from anyone’s accounts, but there is a difference between accessing your own files and sharing them with a 3rd party. We do not allow sharing of copyrighted materials. When a user attempts to perform that action, we show an error message,” Langridge adds.

Mediafire doesn’t stop at simply removing links though. When the company noticed that the standard “permission denied” error message was confusing users, it added “buy now” links to retailers where the music or video files can be bought legally.

“That error has historically been a text message which was confusing to users. We replaced it with a clear message that provides a path for the user to continue. We do that as a convenience to the user,” Langridge tells TorrentFreak.

Buy now!



The process is entirely transparent and users whose files are flagged get a notice explaining what’s going on, Mediafire tells us. No further action is taken against the users, who can still access the files through their private Mediafire account.

The file-hoster further stresses that the feature, which was first implemented a few months ago, effects a very small portion of its userbase. Like any other cloud backup service there are some people who share copyrighted files, but there are also millions who use it for legitimate purposes.

“MediaFire is used every day by millions of people to legitimately store, access, backup, collaborate and share their files, and we are committed to providing these individuals with the most reliable and affordable online storage service on the market,” Langridge says.

View: Original Article

HBO Wants Google to Censor…. HBO.com

Every week Google is asked to remove more than four million URLs from its search engine. While these automated requests are usually legitimate, mistakes happen more often than one might expect. In a recent DMCA notice HBO asked Google to censor links to HBO.com, as well as several other legitimate sites and blogs.

In common with many other websites on the Internet, Google has an obligation to remove infringing content upon receiving a valid DMCA request from copyright holders.

Starting a few months ago copyright holders drastically increased the number of notices sent, totaling more than 50 million last year.

While many of the submitted URLs do indeed link to infringing content, there are also occasional mistakes, often caused by automated filters. Not a big surprise considering the number of requests that go out, but these mistakes can still be quite embarrassing.

Today, for example, we stumbled upon a DMCA notice sent on behalf of HBO in which Google was asked to remove “infringing” links to ‘Eastbound and Down’ content in HBO’s very own store.

And that’s not the only mistake they’ve made.

HBO doesn’t like HBO



The same DMCA notice also lists various other legitimate sites, including Perez Hilton’s blog, Pinterest, MTV.com and IGN.com. All sites wrote reviews or news articles about HBO content, but there were no links to pirated content.

It is worth noting that the DMCA notice in question was sent by DtectNet. This is the anti-piracy division of MarkMonitor, the same company that is also responsible for tracking down BitTorrent pirates as part of the upcoming six-strikes anti-piracy scheme.

The good news is that Google appears to have caught quite a few of these erroneous claims, meaning that not all of the reported sites are censored. However, this task isn’t getting any easier as the number of notices continue to increase.

At least it provides us with content to write about, although with the text “Eastbound and Down” appearing in this article too, who knows how long it will remain indexed by Google….

View: Original Article

Copyright monopolists insist on the idea of controlling the fruits of other people’s labor, such as when other people copy a particular file. This attitude is offensive, insulting, and antithetical to a free market.

The famous philosopher John Locke once published the idea that a person has the right to profit off of the fruits of their labor.

This is only partially true. Once you have sold something, you hold no further rights to profit off of it. This is fairly obvious, but needs to be stated for context.

An entrepreneur can sell one or both of two things: you can sell products, and you can sell services. If somebody decides to make shiny things and sell them, they have a right to profit off the fruit of that labor – but only up until the point where they sell the shiny things. Their ownership of the shiny thing, and their right to profit, ends the second the item is sold to somebody. Conversely, if somebody decides to sell their time in selling services, their right to profit ends the second they stop working for the person they have sold their time to.

In geek terms, entrepreneurship is finding a value differential in society, constructing a conduit between the two endpoints and sticking a generator in the middle of the conduit. Profit ensues from the generator until the value differential has equalized to the point where the pressure is no longer sufficient to overcome the resistance of the generator, at which point the conduit stops working.

This is how a free market works, and it is regarded as the foundation of our economy. However, copyright monopolists are trying their hardest to muddle this simple and fundamental principle, by claiming a continued kind of ownership even after something is sold. That’s not how a market works. That’s a monopoly. That’s harmful. That’s bad.

We have indeed observed before how the copyright monopoly stands in direct opposition to property rights, sabotaging this foundation of our economy and the fundamentals of entrepreneurship.

So for the sake of argument, let’s assume I am given a copy of the movie The Avengers by somebody. It is one of many copies. There are many ones like it, but this one is mine. It is my property in all its aspects.

However, copyright monopolists would argue that they should continue to control my property. This is not just strange, but offensive. Even worse, when I do some labor on my own property, such as executing a “copy file” command on it, the copyright monopolists claim they should control that labor too – as well as the fruits of it. This is outrageous and has me fuming over their arrogance.

When I manufacture another copy of The Avengers using my own property and my own labor, copyright monopolists somehow believe they have a right to the fruits of my labor. I find that idea offensive and insulting.

It is true that the ease of my labor depends on many people having worked on other things before me. However, this is true with all entrepreneurship. My ability to copy a particular file depends not just on those who created the file, but also on those who invented electricity generators, the modern graphics card, the keyboard, wire insulation, storage media, networking protocols, and many, many other things. This is as ancient as Rome: entrepreneurship has always built on the already-performed work of others, and one set of previous such entrepreneurs do obviously not get any kind of special privileges on a functioning market.

Anybody is free to create shiny things, but their ownership over the shiny thing stops the instant they sell it. That’s how a market works. Claiming control over the fruits of other people’s labor, such as when somebody makes a copy of a file using their own property, is deeply, deeply immoral.

View: Original Article

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Pirate Bay's Gottfrid Sends His Warmest Thanks to all Supporters

It’s been a rough few months for Pirate Bay co-founder Gottrid Svartholm. After being plucked from his home in Cambodia, dragged back to Sweden and held in solitary, he’s now being detained in a regular prison. The good news is that he’s a strong guy and coping well. Today he sends his personal thanks to everyone who has taken the time to support him through his ongoing ordeal.

Pirate Bay co-founder is one of the most recognizable characters in the whole file-sharing landscape. His distinctive looks, undoubted abilities and recent history are a potent mix.

While he has never sought fame, fame has found him due to his Pirate Bay activities (not least his responses to copyright holders) and earlier connections to one of the world’s most controversial webhosts, PRQ.

Soon Gottfrid will gain even more exposure when his dry wit and delightfully eccentric traits are laid bare in TPB AFK, a movie which will only gain him even more fans.

However, unlike his supporters Gottfrid will not be able to enjoy the release of the movie. He’s currently being held in Mariefred prison roughly 65 km outside Stockholm and it is highly unlikely he’s going to be able to download it from The Pirate Bay in there.

Gottfrid is staying strong though and today he wants to show his appreciation to everyone who has been doing their bit to make his detention a little more bearable. He can’t do it in person of course, so the message comes through his mother Kristina Svartholm.

“Gottfrid has asked me to send his thanks to all people that have sent him letters, postcards, gifts and so on to the prison where he has been staying since just before Christmas,” Kristina told TorrentFreak.

“The response to the call on The Pirate Bay’s homepage, as well as here at TorrentFreak and in other places to send him a ‘hello’ in prison has thus far been overwhelmingly large and warm. THANK YOU, EVERYONE!!”

Of course Gottrid is unable to thank every supporter personally for the cards, letters and gifts, but hopes that sending his message through proxies will do the trick. In fact, that seems like the most appropriate way of doing it considering his background.

“Gottfrid says that he has covered the walls in his cell with pictures and postcards from all over the world. He has heaps of letters in there as well, together with books and other gifts that people have sent him,” Kristina reveals.

And when Kristina says “heaps” she’s not exaggerating.

“Some days the prison guards have brought him more than a hundred cards and letters, while sighing a bit over this extra work task of theirs,” she adds.

But while the messages are getting through, the kindness of some of Gottfrid’s supporters has been held back by a prison system that dictates what he can and cannot receive.

“Unfortunately he has not received any of the sweets and other goodies that have been sent to him (altogether around 5 kilos so far!) since edible gifts are prohibited,” Kristina explains. “I have brought the gifts to our home and will save them for him so that he will get them as soon as he gets out.”

As revealed earlier this week Gottfrid may soon face additional hacking charges but in the meantime and aside from having little to do, he is doing fine.

“He is treated well by both his fellows in there and people working as guards and he is fine in all respects – except for being a bit bored,” Kristina says.

“No internet, no computer. Some so-called work (folding small pieces of plastic) is offered to him as a time-killer during day time. He reads a lot and looks at TV in his cell, where he gets locked up just before seven in the evening and has to stay until they open the door again at seven in the morning.”

Finally, there is one last piece of amusing piece of information Kristina shared with us, which Gottfrid supporters need to know. A note has been placed in his prison records that warns that the Pirate Bay founder has “a large international network with people that support his criminal activities.”

“That is all of you!!!” Kristina concludes.

view.gifView: Original Article

Russia Wants To Fine Websites For Poor Copyright Takedowns

The Russian government is proposing a fresh approach to the way website operators and service providers are expected to handle copyright takedowns. In a draft law the Ministry of Culture says that takedowns should be executed very quickly and failure to meet the deadlines will result in cash fines, 90 day suspensions and even server confiscations. Critics say it’s the DMCA twisted heavily in favor of rightsholders.

When it comes to the enforcement of copyright Russia is hardly the poster boy of the world’s intellectual property focused companies. In recent years the country has been subjected to intense criticism, especially from the United States, over its failure to curtail piracy both off and online.

It’s expected that Russia will eventually harden its currently lax approach to copyright but if the latest news coming out of the government there is anything to go by, that might be much sooner than most people expected.

A draft law filed by the Ministry of Culture on January 25 proposes that Russia toughens its approach to the handling of copyright takedowns to a level that will terrify technology businesses and give rightsholders a reason to party.

Under current laws such as the DMCA and other regional equivalents, website operators and hosts are required to remove allegedly infringing content once they receive a properly formatted “good faith” complaint. The system is widely used with Google receiving millions of such notices every week. However, if Russia’s draft law is approved, life is going to get very difficult for intermediaries.

The proposed amendments to current legislation will see hosting providers and site owners subjected to strict rules on how they must deal with takedown requests from copyright holders. Website operators will be given a day to remove or block content with hosts given an extra day in the event they have to discuss the takedown request with websites they host.

Furthermore, before allegedly infringing files are removed site owners will be required to make copies and make them available – along with the uploader’s personal details – to “competent authorities or rightsholders.”

But what will really scare Internet businesses is the Ministry of Culture’s proposal to fine companies that fail to meet the standards laid out above. Should a takedown request be dealt with improperly the government is suggesting penalties of between 3,000 rubles ($100) for individuals, increasing to a maximum of 500,000 rubles ($16,630) for businesses. Add on 90 day business suspensions and confiscation of servers and the package is enough to give rightsholders a reason to celebrate.

A lawyer at Mail.ru, a company that has faced legal action in the past due to users uploading copyrighted content, said the Ministry of Culture did not consult industry experts.

“Current legislation fully protects the rights holders, including the Internet,” said Anton Malginova. “Introduction of new mechanisms, not based on the Civil Code, are excessive, disproportionate and inconsistent with the goals and methods of regulation.”

Alexander Panov, Managing Partner at Hostcomm, an organization that represents the largest Russian hosting providers and domain registrars, said the proposals could prove considerably problematic.

“Our experience shows that 90% of these [copyright] complaints are without foundation,” he said, adding that to expect site owners to comply within a day is “actually impossible.”

The draft legislation does offer a small level of balance to Internet users subjected to takedown complaints. Challenges to incorrect notices can be made within 10 days and if rightsholders still insist on content being taken down they can take their case to court. If they fail to file a case within a month, site owners and hosts may lawfully reinstate the disputed content. Users subjected to wrongful claims can demand compensation.

The draft law, filed last Friday and signed by the President of the Russian Federation, ends with a note that it will enter law “90 days after its official publication.”

view.gifView: Original Article

Twitter hacked, 250,000 accounts compromised

Twitter has just reported that earlier this week, it was a victim of a successful compromise of its systems, resulting in the "limited access" to user information, including usernames, email addresses, session tokens, and encrypted/salted passwords.

Twitter has just reported that earlier this week, it was a victim of a successful compromise of its systems, resulting in the "limited access" to user information, including usernames, email addresses, session tokens, and encrypted/salted passwords, affecting approximately 250,000 users.

More details:

This week, we detected unusual access patterns that led to us identifying unauthorized access attempts to Twitter user data. We discovered one live attack and were able to shut it down in process moments later. However, our investigation has thus far indicated that the attackers may have had access to limited user information – usernames, email addresses, session tokens and encrypted/salted versions of passwords – for approximately 250,000 users. As a precautionary security measure, we have reset passwords and revoked session tokens for these accounts. If your account was one of them, you will have recently received (or will shortly) an email from us at the address associated with your Twitter account notifying you that you will need to create a new password. Your old password will not work when you try to log in to Twitter.

According to Bob Lord, Twitter's Director of Information Security, the attack was the work of professionals, and Twitter is actively cooperating with law enforcement in an attempt to prevent further damage caused by these attackers.

What can you do to protect your Twitter account? Ensure that in case you receive a password-reset email from Twitter, it indeed points to Twitter's domain, as opportunistic cybercriminals could easily start impersonating Twitter, and mass mail millions of emails in an attempt to gain access to your account. If you do receive a password-reset email from Twitter, ensure that you're using a strong password, and that you've changed it from a malware-free host.

view.gifView: Original Article

Kim Dotcom: Mega Search Engines Have to Play by the Rules

Kim Dotcom has admitted that Mega is behind the shut down of the French-based indexing site Search-Mega.me. Mega’s team decided to take action because the site didn’t have a takedown policy, which offended some copyright holders. Dotcom stresses that Mega search engines will have to play by the rules in future. Filestube, the largest Mega search engine on the Internet, is an example of a well behaved service.

Yesterday a flurry of bogus DMCA notices made thousands of Mega files unavailable to the public. The actions appeared to be targeted specifically at Mega search engine Mega-Search.me.

At first it was unclear who was behind the actions, but Kim Dotcom admits today that Mega took action against the French site because is wasn’t playing by the rules. Many of the takedown notices weren’t real, Mega was simply removing all links on the site, legal or not.

Talking to TorrentFreak, Dotcom explains that Mega was concerned about the massive press attention the search engine received, with articles often focusing on the many copyrighted files that were indexed. In addition, Mega also received complaints from rightsholders about the search index.

The above triggered Mega to force Mega-Search out of business, proactively. Mega justify their actions by pointing out that Mega-Search.me didn’t play by the rules.

Firstly, it didn’t have its own takedown procedure but simply linked to Mega’s. And on top of that the site used Mega’s logo as well as a similar design which may lead the public to think that it was affiliated with Mega.

In hindsight Dotcom admits that Mega’s response to the situation, which was decided when he was asleep, might not have been ideal. Dotcom apologizes to the users whose legal files are still locked and said he would have approached the situation differently.

“I would have preferred to send the mega-search.me guys a warning and say: put up a takedown procedure that allows third parties to remove links from your index, remove the Mega branding and just be a good corporate citizen that cooperates with rightsholders,” Dotcom tells TorrentFreak.

In part the panicky reaction was motivated by complaints from copyright holders.

“We have had some emails from rightsholders that said ‘these guys don’t even have a takedown procedure, what are you doing about that?’ When we are faced with a situation like this, then we have to act,” Dotcom told us.

Added to that, dozens of news sites that reported on the “infringing” nature of the site.

“If it’s right in front of our face and it’s put to us so prominently, we have to do something about it. Then we are in a state of knowledge and legally required to act.”

However, search engines and indexes are not banned by definition, as long as they play by the rules. This means having a proper takedown policy and a design that is not confusingly similar to Mega.

Looking at the future Dotcom says that Mega wont be policing the Internet, but will respond to “rogue sites” if needed.

“You will be seeing us acting aggressively towards sites that try to mimic Mega and use our logos. We’ll also go after sites that don’t have any takedown facilities, because that’s the biggest problem,” he told TorrentFreak.

This means that sites such as FilesTube, who are playing by the rules, shouldn’t be too worried. FilesTube is currently the largest Mega search engine out there, indexing thousands of links.

FilesTube searching Mega links

AptxgvT.jpg

FilesTube crawls the Internet for links to Mega files and adds these to their search engine. Although Mega deliberately blocks Google from indexing its site, search engine crawlers can spot links that are posted on blogs and other websites.

In a blog post Mega suggests that users are advised not to share files in public, but Dotcom says that this is not the case. People can share whatever they want as long as the files don’t infringe any copyrights.

Mega, meanwhile, hopes to put its focus on improving and expanding their service. Millions of files are added every day and in a few days Mega’s bandwidth consumption will exceed that of New Zealand.

“The site has been growing massively, we have a few million users and over 60 million files. Next week we will be pushing more bandwidth than the whole country of New Zealand,” Dotcom says.

view.gifView: Original Article

Dotcom's Mega Removes Legal Files Citing Bogus DMCA Requests

In recent days thousands of files have been removed from Kim Dotcom’s Mega, some based on bogus (DMCA) takedown notices. In some cases it takes just minutes before Mega disables access to users’ files, claiming they’ve received a takedown notice from a copyright holder. Ironically, Mega also removed access to Kim Dotcom’s own music. The big question is whether there’s a rogue copyright holder on the loose, or if Mega is actively policing the Internet.

With the newly launched Mega, Kim Dotcom and his associates are doing all they can to be “good corporate citizens.” However, there are signs that under the current setup users rights are being trumped to accommodate copyright holders.

TorrentFreak has received reports from people whose perfectly legal files were locked in their Mega accounts for alleged copyright violations. In all cases this happened after these users published links to the files elsewhere on the Internet.

A quick look on some of the Mega indexing sites shows that these are not isolated incidents. Thousands of publicly shared Mega files are now dead links but while many of these pointed to copyrighted material, there’s also quite a bit of collateral damage.

Mega-search.me, one of the larger Mega indexes, became a repository of dead links overnight. The site in question allows the public to post links to files shared on Mega. It currently lists nearly 8,000 links, but apart from the most recent submissions these are “no longer available” on Mega.

Mega takedown

3yhBiH6.jpg

The censored content includes copyrighted music and movies, but also free to share software such as Ubuntu and copies of Kim Dotcom’s very own music. Interestingly, this mass removal of files appears to contradict Kim Dotcom’s statement earlier today that Mega receives just 50 DMCA takedown requests per day, unless of course there is additional proactive work underway.

Baroque Metal band DecaY from Lyon told TorrentFreak that the music they shared on Mega also fell victim to the mass takedowns.

“I am quite shocked that they would take out my insignificant 100% legal content in the blink of an eye,” the band’s Jeremy Allison says.

Certainly, something is not right.

To test how quickly a file is removed by Mega we decided to post some previously uploaded legal content to Mega-search.me ourselves. Our uploads included a few Dan Bull songs, a clip from the Pirate Bay documentary TPB-AFK, a video explaining fair use and Kim Dotcom’s single Mr. President.

Quite shockingly, the files were pulled down by Mega in a matter of minutes, claiming they had received copyright infringement notices for each of them.

We are in receipt of a takedown notice affecting the following public link
in your account:

https://mega.co.nz/#!iRQRnLzT

Please be reminded that MEGA respects the copyrights of others and requires that users of the MEGA cloud service comply with the laws of copyright. You are strictly prohibited from using the MEGA cloud service to infringe copyrights. You may not upload, download, store, share, display, stream, distribute, e-mail, link to, transmit or otherwise make available any files, data, or content that infringes any copyright or other proprietary rights of any person or entity.

Furthermore, please be reminded that, pursuant to our Terms of Service, accounts found to be repeat infringers are subject to termination.


It didn’t stop at one email either, as can be seen below.

Mega mails

Cv8lprK.jpg

Unfortunately no information was provided about the alleged copyright holder who sent the notice. TorrentFreak replied to the email asking for clarification, but we have yet to receive a response from Mega. So what’s going on here?

It appears that someone or something is checking all uploads on public indexes such as Mega-search.me to pull down all the links that are added. This clearly happens automatically and without any verification of the copyrighted status of the file.

The big question, however, is where these bogus takedown notices come from.

Is there a rogue copyright holder ordering Mega to remove thousands of files just minutes after they are posted? And does Mega then process these takedowns notices in near real-time without verifying the content?

Or could it be that Mega itself has put indexes such as Mega-search.me on a blacklist to prevent copyrighted material from spreading, perhaps in an effort to prevent potential bad press that comes with it?

Whatever the case, the end result is that users can’t access perfectly legal files stored in their Mega accounts until a counter notice is processed. This prevents them from sharing their own work in public and also makes it impossible for them to download it to their own computers.

Mega account issue

UTV9SyO.png

TorrentFreak reached out to Kim Dotcom through various channels for a comment on the issue, but we have yet to hear back. Readers are welcome to upload legal Mega links to Mega-search.me themselves to see what’s going on.

view.gifView: Original Article